Efficacy and utility of antifibrinolytics in pediatric spine surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Antifibrinolytics have gained increasing attention in minimizing blood loss and mitigating the risks associated with massive transfusions, including infection and coagulopathy in pediatric patients undergoing spine surgery. Nevertheless, the selection of optimal agent is still a matter of debate. We aim to review the utility of these agents and compare the efficacy of antifibrinolytics in pediatric and adolescent spine surgeries. A comprehensive search was performed in Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases for relevant works. Studies providing quantitative data on predefined outcomes were included. Primary outcome was perioperative bleeding between the groups. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, rate of complications, and operation time. Twenty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis incorporating 2553 patients. The use of Tranexamic acid (RoM: 0.71, 95%CI: [0.62-0.81], p < 0.001, I2 = 88%), Aprotinin (RoM: 0.54, 95%CI: [0.46-0.64], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%), and Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (RoM: 0.71, 95%CI: [0.62-0.81], p < 0.001, I2 = 60%) led to a 29%, 46%, and 29% reduction in perioperative blood loss, respectively. Network meta-analysis revealed higher probability of efficacy with Tranexamic acid compared to Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (P score: 0.924 vs. 0.571). The rate of complications was not statistically different between each two antifibrinolytic agent or antifibrinolytics compared to placebo or standard of care. Our network meta-analysis suggests a superior efficacy of all antifibrinolytics compared to standard of care/placebo in reducing blood loss and transfusion rate. Further adequately-powered randomized clinical trials are recommended to reach definite conclusion on comparative performance of these agents and to also provide robust objective assessments and standardized outcome data and safety profile on antifibrinolytics in pediatric and adolescent pediatric surgeries.

What is the Philosophy of Neurosurgery? Systematic Review and Defining the Discipline.

INTRODUCTION: Despite centuries of joint investigation of philosophy and neurological interventions, a founding account for the philosophy of neurosurgery has yet to be rigorously constructed or defended. This paper reviews recent work on the philosophy of neurosurgery, spanning metaphysics, epistemology, and value theory, to establish a framework and clinical relevance for study in the philosophy of neurosurgery. METHODS: A systematic review of an online database was conducted using the broad search terms, "Philosophy AND (Neurosurgery OR Neurological Surgery)." Records were included if they demonstrated relevance to the philosophy of neurosurgery and analytical rigor, but were excluded if solely legal, clinical, or ethical principles were considered without substantive discussion of underlying ethical frameworks and philosophical principles. RESULTS: Of 8025 candidates from online and print records, 16 records (14 from online sources and 2 from an edited volume) met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Three dealt with metaphysics, 3 dealt with epistemology, 4 dealt with value theory, 5 dealt with metaphysics/epistemology, and 1 dealt with value theory/metaphysics. Questions of free will, consciousness, personal identity, neurosurgical knowledge, ascription of other minds, deontology, and minimalism, among others, were considered. DISCUSSION: Based on identified studies, the philosophy of neurosurgery is defined as the discipline of rigorously and methodically addressing metaphysical, epistemological, and value-theoretic questions arising from physically intervening in the nervous system. We discuss future directions for questions within the philosophy of neurosurgery and consider their relevance for patient care and the practice of neurosurgery.

Efficacy of prophylactic use of intraoperative vancomycin powder in preventing surgical site infection in neurological surgeries in Irrua, Nigeria: A randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine the efficacy of intraoperative vancomycin powder in preventing SSIs in neurological surgeries. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study of patients who had clean cranial and non-implant spine surgeries at the Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria from February 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A patients had prophylactic intraoperative vancomycin powder applied to the surgical bed before wound closure while group B patients did not. Patients in both groups were followed up for 30 days post-operatively for evidence of SSI. The occurrence of SSIs was determined using clinical and laboratory parameters. Baseline characteristics, operative details, rates of wound infection, and microbiological data for each case were recorded. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Scientific Solution (SPSS) version 23 software. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were randomized into 2 groups of 21 patients each. The age range of the patients was 20 to 80 years. The majority of the patients were males (32 out of 42). The mean age of patients in group A was 48.05 ± 17.03 years, while group B had a mean age of 45.95 ± 19.14 years. The mean Body Mass Index of patients in groups A and B were 23.92 ± 5.21 and 23.21 ± 3.99 respectively. Seven out of 21 patients (33.3 %) in the control group ( group B) had superficial SSIs while no patient in the experimental group had SSI, p-value < 0.05. The organisms cultured were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative vancomycin powder was effective in reducing the rate of SSIs following neurological surgeries and without adverse drug reactions.

Neurosurgery residency match for international medical graduates in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Training of international medical graduates (IMGs) offers opportunities for the US neurosurgery community to engage the global talent pool and impact national and international healthcare. Here, the authors analyzed the time trend of IMGs matching into US neurosurgery programs and identified potential opportunities for enhancing IMG engagement. METHODS: The authors analyzed the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) match results, NRMP program director (PD) surveys, and applicant surveys from 2013 to 2022. Regression methods were used to analyze time trends. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2022, the number of US neurosurgery residency positions increased by 17.6% (from 204 to 240). During this period, the percentage of IMGs matching into neurosurgery increased from 3.5% to 7%, translating into a 6.8% increase in the likelihood of a successful IMG match per year (95% CI 0.3%-13.8%, p = 0.042). The likelihoods of a successful match for US MDs and IMGs scoring > 260 on the USMLE Step 1 were > 90% and approximately 55%, respectively. In PD surveys, approximately 90% of PDs indicated that they seldom/never interview or rank IMGs. In terms of factors that influenced the PD decision for interviewing/ranking, IMGs are disadvantaged in several categories, including the ability to secure an audition elective/rotation, and proper letters of recommendation, as well as the influence of the culture on the preconceived perception of poor interpersonal skills. CONCLUSIONS: The number of IMGs matching successfully in neurosurgery has increased marginally during the past decade. The authors outline the challenges that IMGs encounter in this process and suggest strategies for considerations of IMG training in NRMP-associated institutions.

Clinical Spectrum of Postsurgical Parsonage-Turner Syndrome: A Perspective From an Electrodiagnostic Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS) is an underdiagnosed disorder characterized by the acute onset of severe pain in the shoulder/scapula/arm followed by muscle weakness/numbness in the distribution of nerves derived from the brachial plexus (BP). Surgical procedures are one of several antecedent events of PTS. This study describes the clinical spectrum of postsurgical Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PSPTS) in a large cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts of patients diagnosed with PTS during a 16-year (2006-2022) retrospective review were analyzed to identify cases of PSPTS. The clinical criteria for PSPTS included the new onset of severe pain two days to four weeks after a surgical procedure followed by weakness of muscles innervated by one or more nerves arising from the BP. EDX criteria consist of denervation localized to branches of the BP. PSPTS cases were subdivided into two categories: definite PSPTS (surgery at a remote site) and probable PSPTS (surgery of the ipsilateral upper extremity or the cervical spine). RESULTS: Of 202 patients (204 episodes) diagnosed with PTS, 111 (54%) were idiopathic and 61 (30%) were PSPTS. Of the 61 PSPTS episodes, 26 were definite and 35 were probable PSPTS. The anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) was most affected, followed by the posterior interosseous (PIN), and suprascapular nerve. CONCLUSION: In this series, surgery was the most commonly recognized antecedent event for PTS, and the AIN and PIN were the most frequent nerves affected. Surgeons should consider PTS in patients who develop postoperative severe shoulder pain and weakness of muscles innervated by the BP.

European training requirements in neurological surgery: A new outcomes-based 3 stage UEMS curriculum.

Introduction: Post-graduate training in medical education has seen a seismic shift from time-based to competency-based training. We describe a competency-based European Training Requirement (ETR) in neurological surgery that is applicable across all European centres. Research question: To develop the ETR in Neurological Surgery using a competency-based approach. Material and methods: The competency-based approach ETR in neurosurgery was developed in accordance with the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) Training Requirements guidelines. The UEMS ETR template, based upon the UEMS Charter on Post-graduate Training was utilized. Consultation took place with Council and Board members of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS), the Young Neurosurgeons forum of the EANS and members of the UEMS. Results: We describe a competency-based curriculum comprising 3 stages of training. Five entrustable professional activities, outpatient care, inpatient care, emergency on call, operative competencies and team working are described. The curriculum emphasizes the importance of high levels of professionalism, early consultation with other specialists where relevant and the importance of reflective practice. Outcomes must be reviewed at annual performance reviews. Evidence of competency should be multifaceted and include work-based assessments, logbook data, multisource feedback, patient feedback and examination performance. Required competencies for certification/licensing are provided. Approval for the ETR was provided by the UEMS. Discussion and conclusion: A competency-based ETR was developed and approved by UEMS. This provides a suitable framework for the development of national curricula that train neurosurgeons to an internationally recognized level of capability.

Assessment of the impact of frailty on adverse surgical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial tumors using modified frailty index: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Modified frailty index (MFI) is an emerging quantitative measure of frailty; however, the quantified risk of adverse outcomes in surgeries for intracranial tumors associated with increasing MFI scores has not been thoroughly reviewed in a comprehensive manner. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched to identify observational studies on the association between 5 and 11 item-modified frailty index (MFI) and perioperative outcomes for neurosurgical procedures including complications, mortality, readmission, and reoperation rate. Primary analysis pooled all comparisons with MFI scores greater than or equal to 1 versus non-frail participants using mixed-effects multilevel model for each outcome. RESULTS: In total, 24 studies were included in the review and 19 studies with 114,707 surgical operations were included in the meta-analysis. While increasing MFI scores were associated with worse prognosis for all included outcomes, reoperation rate was only significantly higher in patients with MFI ≥ 3. Among surgical pathologies, glioblastoma was influenced by a greater extent to the impact of frailty on complications and mortality that most other etiologies. In agreement with qualitative evaluation of the included studies, meta-regression did not reveal association between mean age of the comparisons and complications rate. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis provides quantitative risk assessment of adverse outcomes in neuro-oncological surgeries with increased frailty. The majority of literature suggests that MFI is a superior and independent predictor of adverse outcomes compared to age.

Treatment of adult deformity surgery by orthopedic and neurological surgeons: trends in treatment, techniques, and costs by specialty.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgery to correct adult spinal deformity (ASD) is performed by both neurological surgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Despite well-documented high costs and complication rates following ASD surgery, there is a dearth of research investigating trends in treatment according to surgeon subspeciality. PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to perform an analysis of surgical trends, costs and complications of ASD operations by physician specialty using a large, nationwide sample. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study using an administrative claims database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 12,929 patients were identified with ASD that underwent deformity surgery performed by neurological or orthopedic surgeons. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was surgical case volume by surgeon specialty. Secondary outcomes included costs, medical complications, surgical complications, and reoperation rates (30-day, 1-year, 5-year, and total). METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried to identify patients who underwent ASD correction from 2010 to 2019. The cohort was stratified to identify patients who were treated by either orthopedic or neurological surgeons. Surgical volume, baseline characteristics, and surgical techniques were examined between cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess the cost, rate of reoperation and complication according to each subspecialty while controlling for number of levels fused, rate of pelvic fixation, age, gender, region and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Alpha was set to 0.05 and a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was utilized to set the significance threshold at p ≤.000521. RESULTS: A total of 12,929 ASD patients underwent deformity surgery performed by neurological or orthopedic surgeons. Orthopedic surgeons performed most deformity procedures accounting for 64.57% (8,866/12,929) of all ASD operations, while the proportion treated by neurological surgeons increased 44.2% over the decade (2010: 24.39% vs 2019: 35.16%; p<.0005). Neurological surgeons more frequently operated on older patients (60.52 vs 55.18 years, p<.0005) with more medical comorbidities (CCI scores: 2.01 vs 1.47, p<.0005). Neurological surgeons also performed higher rates of arthrodesis between one and six levels (OR: 1.86, p<.0005), three column osteotomies (OR: 1.35, p<.0005) and navigated or robotic procedures (OR: 3.30, p<.0005). Procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons had significantly lower average costs as compared to neurological surgeons (orthopedic surgeons: $17,971.66 vs neurological surgeons: $22,322.64, p=.253). Adjusted logistic regression controlling for number of levels fused, pelvic fixation, age, sex, region, and comorbidities revealed that patients within neurosurgical care had similar odds of complications to orthopaedic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation of over 12,000 ASD patients demonstrates orthopedic surgeons continue to perform the majority of ASD correction surgery, although neurological surgeons are performing an increasingly larger percentage over time with a 44% increase in the proportion of surgeries performed in the decade. In this cohort, neurological surgeons more frequently operated on older and more comorbid patients, utilizing shorter-segment fixation with greater use of navigation and robotic assistance.

Neurosurgical Anesthesia: Optimizing Outcomes with Agent Selection.

Anesthesia in neurosurgery embodies a vital element in the development of neurosurgical intervention. This undisputed interest has offered surgeons and anesthesiologists an array of anesthetic selections to utilize, though with this allowance comes the equally essential requirement of implementing a maximally appropriate agent. To date, there remains a lack of consensus and official guidance on optimizing anesthetic choice based on operating priorities including hemodynamic parameters (e.g., CPP, ICP, MAP) in addition to the route of procedure and pathology. In this review, the authors detail the development of neuroanesthesia, summarize the advantages and drawbacks of various anesthetic classes and agents, while lastly cohesively organizing the current literature of randomized trials on neuroanesthesia across various procedures.

Augmenting Career Longevity: An Analysis of Ergonomics Training Among 134 Neurological Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Work-related pain among neurosurgeons remains understudied, yet can have long-term consequences which affect operative efficiency and efficacy, career longevity, and life outside of work. OBJECTIVE: This study provides insight into the extent of pain experienced by neurosurgeons and the effect of ergonomics training on pain. METHODS: An online survey pertaining to ergonomics and pain was sent to all neurosurgeons on the Council of State Neurosurgical Societies (CSNS) email distribution list. Statistical comparisons of age groups against pain levels and ergonomics training against pain levels, as well as multivariate linear regression of demographics, training, and operating factors against pain levels were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four neurosurgeons responded to the survey. The mean average severity of pain across respondents was 3.3/10 and the mean peak severity of pain was 5.1/10. Among the reported peak pain severity scores, neurosurgeons with 21-30 years of operating experience had significantly higher pain scores than those with 11-20 years of experience (mean 6.2 vs. 4.2; P < 0.05), while neurosurgeons with more than 30 years of experience had significantly less pain than those with 21-30 years of experience (mean 4.4 vs. 6.2, P = 0.005). Training in ergonomics did not significantly improve respondents' reported peak or mean pain severities (17.9% reported having ergonomics training). CONCLUSIONS: Ergonomics training did not appear to make a difference in neurosurgeons' pain severities. This may signify a need to optimize ergonomics pedagogy to achieve observable benefits.

Innovative growth and development of a neurological surgery residency cadaveric skull base simulation training program: A single institution experience.

OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgical cadaveric and simulation training is a valuable opportunity for residents and fellows to develop as neurosurgeons, further neuroanatomy knowledge, and develop decision-making and technical expertise. The authors describe the growth and development of Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Department of Neurological Surgery (NSG) resident hands-on simulation skull base course and provide details of course layout and setup. METHODS: A three-part surgical simulation series was created to provide training in cadaveric skull base procedures. Course objectives were outlined for participants. Residents participated in NSG hands-on simulation courses (years 2015-2020) and completed annual course curriculum and anonymous course evaluations, which included free text reviews. Courses were evaluated by Likert scale analysis within Python, and free text was quantified using Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning (VADER). Descriptive statistics were calculated and plotted using Python's Seaborn and Matplotlib library modules. RESULTS: Analysis included 162 skull base (anterior fossa, middle fossa and lateral, and endoscopic endonasal-based) simulation course evaluations. Resident responses were overwhelmingly positive. Likert responses demonstrated high average responses for each question (4.62 ± 0.56 and above). A positive attitude about simulation courses is supported by an average compound sentiment value of 0.558 ± 0.285. CONCLUSION: This is the first time Likert responses and sentiment analysis have been used to demonstrate how neurosurgical residents view a comprehensive, multi-year hands-on simulation training program. We hope the information presented serves as a guide for other institutions to develop their own residency educational curriculum in cadaveric skull base procedures.

The Epidemiology of Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors.

CNS tumors are a diverse group of neoplasms that emerge from a variety of different CNS cell types. These tumors may be benign, malignant, or borderline in nature. The majority of high grade glial tumors are fatal, with the exception of pilocytic astrocytoma. Primary malignant CNS tumors occur at a global annual rate of 2.1 to 5.8 per 100,000 persons. Males are more likely to develop malignant brain tumors than females, whereas benign meningiomas are more common in adult females. Additionally, gender inequalities in non-malignant tumors peak between the ages of 25 and 29 years. Only a small number of genetic variants have been associated with survival and prognosis. Notably, central nervous system (CNS) tumors exhibit significant age, gender, and race variation. Race is another factor that affects the incidence of brain and spinal cord tumors. Different races exhibit variation in terms of the prevalence of brain and CNS malignancies. This chapter discusses ongoing research on brain and spinal cord tumor epidemiology, as well as the associated risks and accompanied disorders.

The Committee on Advanced Subspecialty Training-accredited postgraduate neurosurgery fellowship application experience: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: The neurosurgery fellowship application process is heterogenous. Therefore, the authors conducted a survey of individuals graduating from Committee on Advanced Subspecialty Training (CAST)-accredited fellowships in the past 5 years to examine 1) experiences with the fellowship application process, 2) perspectives on the process, 3) reasons for pursuing a given subspecialty and fellowship, and 4) post-fellowship practices. METHODS: A survey querying demographics, experiences with and perspectives on the fellowship application process, and factors contributing to the pursuit of a given fellowship was distributed to individuals who had graduated from CAST-accredited fellowships in the past 5 years. The survey response period was May 22, 2021-June 22, 2021. RESULTS: Of 273 unique individuals who had graduated from CAST-accredited fellowships in the past 5 years, 65 (29.7%) were included in this analysis. The most common postgraduate year (PGY) during which respondents applied for fellowship positions was PGY5 (43.8%), whereas the most common training level at which respondents accepted a fellowship position was PGY6 (46.9%), with a large degree of variability for both (range PGY4-PGY7). Only 43.1% respondents reported an application deadline for their fellowship. A total of 77.4% respondents received 1-2 fellowship position offers, and 13.4% indicated that there was a match process. In total, 64.5% respondents indicated that the fellowship offer timeline was mostly or very asynchronous. The time frame for applicants to decline or accept a fellowship offer was heterogeneous and mismatched among institutions. Respondents agreed that a more standardized application timeline would be beneficial (median response "agree"), and 83.1% of respondents indicated that PGY5 or PGY6 was the appropriate time to interview for a fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents reported heterogeneous experiences in applying for a fellowship, indicated that a standardized application timeline including interviews at PGY5 or PGY6 would be beneficial, and preferred streamlining the fellowship application process.

The role of neurosurgeons in global public health: the case of folic acid fortification of staple foods to prevent spina bifida.

OBJECTIVE: The global neurosurgery movement arose at the crossroads of unmet neurosurgical needs and public health to address the global burden of neurosurgical disease. The case of folic acid fortification (FAF) of staple foods for the prevention of spina bifida and anencephaly (SBA) represents an example of a new neurosurgical paradigm focused on public health intervention in addition to the treatment of individual cases. The Global Alliance for the Prevention of Spina Bifida-F (GAPSBiF), a multidisciplinary coalition of neurosurgeons, pediatricians, geneticists, epidemiologists, food scientists, and fortification policy experts, was formed to advocate for FAF of staple foods worldwide. This paper serves as a review of the work of GAPSBiF thus far in advocating for universal FAF of commonly consumed staple foods to equitably prevent SBA caused by folic acid insufficiency. METHODS: A narrative review was performed using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. RESULTS: In this review, the authors describe the impact of SBA on patients, caregivers, and health systems, as well as characterize the multifaceted requirements for proper spina bifida care, including multidisciplinary clinics and the transition of care, while highlighting the role of neurosurgeons. Then they discuss prevention policy approaches, including supplementation, fortification, and hybrid efforts with folic acid. Next, they use the example of FAF of staple foods as a model for neurosurgeons' involvement in global public health through clinical practice, research, education and training, and advocacy. Last, they describe mechanisms for involvement in the above initiatives as a potential academic tenure track, including institutional partnerships, organized neurosurgery, neurosurgical expert groups, nongovernmental organizations, national or international governments, and multidisciplinary coalitions. CONCLUSIONS: The role of neurosurgeons in caring for children with spina bifida extends beyond treating patients in clinical practice and includes research, education and training, and advocacy initiatives to promote context-specific, evidence-based initiatives to public health problems. Promoting and championing FAF serves as an example of the far-reaching, impactful role that neurosurgeons worldwide may play at the intersection of neurosurgery and public health.

The Top 100 Most Cited Neurosurgical Articles on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. This study uses a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited neurosurgical COVID-19-related articles to date to identify and determine their characteristics. METHODS: The Scopus library was searched for all published articles on neurosurgery and COVID-19. The main keywords were used for the search "neurosurgery, neurosurgical, and COVID-19". English language articles reporting on neurosurgical aspects during COVID-19 were included in the study. The retrieved top 100 articles were analyzed, and the following characteristics were noted for each article: 1) article title, 2) year of publication, 3) citations, 4) first author, 5) corresponding author, 6) names of other authors, 7) journal name 8) article type, 9) study focus and 10) involvement of the patient. RESULTS: Our search obtained articles published from December 2019 until 29 March 2022. It was observed that 93% of the documents were published in 2020. The top 100 articles have been cited 2649 times in total. The most cited article was "Factors Associated with Surgical Mortality and Complications among Patients with and without Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy" by Doglietto F. et al., published in JAMA Neurology in June 2020, with 124 citations. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis facilitated in making evidence-based clinical decisions and drawing the attention of researchers to identify and contribute to the increasing scientific work by identifying the top 100 most cited neurosurgical COVID-19-related articles published.

Hypertriglyceridemia is associated with stroke after non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery in the older patients: A nested case-control study.

Introduction: Geriatric postoperative stroke is a rare but serious complication after surgery. The association between hypertriglyceridemia and postoperative stroke remains controversial, especially in older patients undergoing non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery. The study aims to address this clinical dilemma. Materials and methods: We conducted a nested case-control study among 9601 aged patients undergoing non-cardiac non-neurological surgery from October 2015 to 2021. A total of 22 positive cases were matched for the surgical type and time, to 88 control patients by a ratio of 1:4. The effect of hypertriglyceridemia on the occurrence of postoperative stroke within 30 days after surgery was estimated using conditional logistic regression analysis by adjusting to various potential confounders. Results: A total of 22 cases developed ischemia stroke after surgery, and compared with the non-stroke group, they had more postoperative ICU admission, longer postoperative hospitalization and higher total cost (all p < 0.05), and more patients were presenting with preoperative hypertriglyceridemia [8 (36.4%) vs. 15 (17.0%), p = 0.045]. There was a significant association between hypertriglyceridemia and postoperative stroke, with adjusted odds ratios of 6.618 (95% CI 1.286, 34.064) (p = 0.024). The above results remained robust in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Among older patients undergoing non-cardiac and non-neurological surgery, hypertriglyceridemia was associated with significant increased risk of postoperative stroke.

Learning curves in robotic neurosurgery: a systematic review.

The transition to performing procedures robotically generally entails a period of adjustment known as a learning curve as the surgeon develops a familiarity with the technology. However, no study has comprehensively examined robotic learning curves across the field of neurosurgery. We conducted a systematic review to characterize the scope of literature on robotic learning curves in neurosurgery, assess operative parameters that may involve a learning curve, and delineate areas for future investigation. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Following deduplication, articles were screened by title and abstract for relevance. Remaining articles were screened via full text for final inclusion. Bibliographic and learning curve data were extracted. Of 746 resultant articles, 32 articles describing 3074 patients were included, of which 23 (71.9%) examined spine, 4 (12.5%) pediatric, 4 (12.5%) functional, and 1 (3.1%) general neurosurgery. The parameters assessed for learning curves were heterogeneous. In total, 8 (57.1%) of 14 studies found reduced operative time with increased cases, while the remainder demonstrated no learning curve. Six (60.0%) of 10 studies reported reduced operative time per component with increased cases, while the remainder indicated no learning curve. Radiation time, radiation time per component, robot time, registration time, setup time, and radiation dose were assessed by ≤ 4 studies each, with 0-66.7% of studies demonstrated a learning curve. Four (44.4%) of 9 studies on accuracy showed improvement over time, while the others indicated no improvement over time. The number of cases required to reverse the learning curve ranged from 3 to 75. Learning curves are common in robotic neurosurgery. However, existing studies demonstrate high heterogeneity in assessed parameters and the number of cases that comprise the learning curve. Future studies should seek to develop strategies to reduce the number of cases required to reach the learning curve.

Ethics of Transitioning from Curative Care to Palliative Care: Potential Conflicts of Interest Using the Example of Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical conditions are often incurable and lead to disability, severe physical symptoms, and distress for patients and families. Neurosurgeons may be responsible for transitioning management from curative to palliative. We sought to analyze the ethics of transitioning care from curative to palliative in patients in one's own specialty. METHODS: This was a case-based narrative review. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched with no restrictions on date. Studies relevant to the topic were included. RESULTS: After providing an introductory case, we defined the curative and palliative neurosurgical treatment paradigms, clarified the concept of transition of care from curative to palliative, and contrasted generalist and specialist palliative care. Next, we provided an overview of core ethical principles. We then described key considerations involved in transitioning patients from curative to palliative care in one's own specialty, namely, knowledge, communication, uncertainty, and futility. Finally, we provided an analysis of the introductory case, highlighting the conflict of interest inherent in the transition. CONCLUSIONS: It is acceptable for neurosurgeons and other specialists with adequate palliative care training to manage the transition to palliative care in most cases, preferably as part of multidisciplinary care teams. While we discuss the example of neurosurgery, this analysis applies to other specialties where care transitions from curative to palliative intent occur. Across specialties, patient preferences and values are foundational in the timing and specifics of this transition.

COVID-19 Impact on Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion: A Single Institution Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have demonstrated that the absolute numbers of select surgical interventions for myocardial infarction, stroke, and appendicitis decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly due to overall decreased hospital presentation. We sought to identify if this pattern was also true for children with hydrocephalus and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedures. We hypothesized that there would be a detectable decrease in CSF diversion procedures performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, as compared to a pre-COVID-19 baseline. METHODS: A chart review of all patients that underwent a CSF diversion procedure from March 2019 to February 2021 was performed at Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. The pre-COVID-19 period was defined as March 2019 to February 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic period was defined as March 2020 to February 2021. CSF diversion procedures included endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), ETV/choroid plexus cauterization (CPC), initial shunt placement, shunt removal/replacement, shunt revision, and temporization procedures. Data included gender, race, ethnicity, insurance type, etiology of hydrocephalus, type of procedure, and whether the procedure was performed due to infection.  Results: Overall, there was no significant difference in the absolute number of CSF diversion procedures performed when comparing the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods (244 and 238, respectively). Furthermore, there was no observed difference in the gender, ethnicity, or insurance status of children undergoing a CSF diversion procedure. There was, however, a significant increase in the number of procedures performed due to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic at our institution (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Unlike several other surgical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, a statistically significant change in CSF diversion procedures was not observed at our institution. The increased number of procedures for infection at our institution is likely multifactorial and will be investigated further.

Language and Geographic Representation of Neurosurgical Journals: A Meta-Science Study.

OBJECTIVE: Medical journals have a role in promoting representation of neurosurgeons who speak primary languages other than English. We sought to characterize the language of publication and geographic origin of neurosurgical journals, delineate associations between impact factor (IF) and language and geographic variables, and describe steps to overcome language barriers to publishing. METHODS: Web of Science, Scopus, and Ulrich's Serial Analysis system were searched for neurosurgery journals. The journals were screened for relevance. Language of publication, country and World Health Organization region, World Bank income status and gross domestic product, and citation metrics were extracted. RESULTS: Of 867 journals, 74 neurosurgical journals were included. Common publication languages were English (52, 70.3%), Mandarin (5, 6.8%), and Spanish (4, 5.4%). Countries of publication for the greatest number of journals were the United States (23, 31.1%), United Kingdom (8, 10.8%), and China (6, 8.1%). Most journals originated from the Americas region (29, 39.2%), the European region (28, 37.8%), and from high-income countries (n = 54, 73.0%). Median IF was 1.55 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.89-2.40). Journals written in English (1.77 [IQR 1.00-2.87], P = 0.032) and from high-income countries (1.81 [IQR 1.0-2.70], P = 0.046) had highest median IF. When excluding outliers, there was a small but positive correlation between per capita gross domestic product and IF (ß = 0.021, P = 0.03, R2 = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: Language concordance represents a substantial barrier to research equity in neurosurgery, limiting dissemination of ideas of merit that currently have inadequate outlets for readership. Initiatives aimed at increasing the accessibility of neurosurgical publishing to underrepresented authors are essential.